![]() |
||||
Methodology
|
Our services are based upon a powerful new methodology that can be applied to many kinds of strategic, management, marketing, operations, and organizational programs and initiatives to determine what works, what doesn't, and why. The goal is to focus on those approaches that work best in practice and avoid wasting money and time on those that have proven weak or even detrimental. There are three main steps: 1. Measurement Assess the situation and approach + track actions and results 2. Analysis Link actions with results to evaluate and understand the approach 3. Knowledge Create transferable knowledge by documenting the approach. To use our analytical methodology, you must have a sufficient number of implementations ("action experiments") in a variety of situations to make our modeling and statistical techniques valid. Once validated, these models can provide not only solid performance metrics that distinguish strong from weak approaches but also identify key drivers that produced the observed results in each situation knowledge that is vital for applying an approach to a new situation. An important part of our methodology is the use of "collaborative projects" to expand both the number and variety of program implementations that we can analyze. These projects generally involve a number of similar businesses so that knowledge developed in the project can be shared. For additional information on collaborative projects ... è While we characterize our methodology as "new", it is really the combination of statistical and modeling techniques and the application to management situations that are, to our knowledge, new. How does this methodology perform? We can draw some early conclusions from results publicized by QualPro, a consulting firm that uses a primarily statistical technique they call "multi-variable testing (MVT)". They found that: « 22% of improvement ideas actually hurt results « 53% of proposed improvements made no difference « 25% of ideas made a significant improvement. We anticipate somewhat similar findings in management approaches that we evaluate up to 75% of approaches implemented by organizations being either damaging or ineffective. This makes knowledge of the remaining 25% extremely important.
|
|||